BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Eurandom - ECPv4.9.3.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Eurandom
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.eurandom.tue.nl
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Eurandom
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190319
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190323
DTSTAMP:20190618T053358
CREATED:20181112T134508Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190418T075522Z
UID:2339-1552953600-1553299199@www.eurandom.tue.nl
SUMMARY:YES X : "Understanding Deep Learning: Generalization\, Approximation and Optimization"
DESCRIPTION:Video-taped Tutorial Lectures available\n\n\n\nPeter Bartlett\nDeep Networks I\n\n\n\nDeep Networks II\n\n\n\nOptimization in Deep Residual Networks\n\n\nJohannes Schmidt-Hieber\nStatistical Theory I\n\n\n\nStatistical Theory II\n\n\n\nStatistical Theory III\n\n\nNathan Srebro\nInductive Bias\, Generalization and the role of Optimization\nin Deep Learning I\n\n\n\nInductive Bias\, Generalization and the role of Optimization\nin Deep Learning II\n\n\n\nInductive Bias\, Generalization and the role of Optimization\nin Deep Learning III\n\n\n\nSummary\nDuring the last decade\, deep learning has drawn increasing attention both in machine learning and statistics because of its superb empirical performance in various fields of application\, including speech and image recognition\, natural language processing\, social network filtering\, bioinformatics\, drug design and board games (e.g. Alpha go\, Alpha zero). This raises important and fundamental questions on why these methods are so successful\, and to what extent they can be applied to a wide range of problems. \nAlthough theoretical results from the 1980s and 1990s already describe the statistical behavior of small neural networks if we assume their parameters can be optimized exactly\, this situation is far from what happens in practice. Instead\, two crucial features of modern applications are that the number of parameters is much larger than the sample size\, and that non-convexity fundamentally prevents optimization methods from finding the globally optimal parameters. In fact\, it has become clear that the statistical properties of deep learning are inextricably intertwined with how their parameters are being optimized. To explain the behavior of modern deep learning it is therefore necessary to understand the subtle interplay between generalization\, approximation and optimization. Developing such an understanding is particularly important if deep learning is to play a role in more sensitive application areas such as medical practice\, self-driving cars\, air-traffic control\, and so on. \nThe aim of the workshop is to give a balanced representation of the most recent advances on these topics\, from theory to applications\, and spanning both statistics\, optimization and machine learning topics. The workshop targets primarily (but not exclusively) young researchers\, in particular PhD students\, postdocs and junior early stage researchers. The workshop will take place over 4 days and consists of tutorial courses and invited talks given by world experts in the field. The tutorial courses will each consist of roughly of 3 hours of lectures and the invited talks will be 1 hour. Furthermore\, some of the junior participants will be given the opportunity to present their current work during the workshop by giving a short (30 minutes) oral presentation and possibly poster presentations (depending on the number of submissions). \nOrganizers\n\n\n\nPaulo de Andrade Serra\nTU Eindhoven\n\n\nRui Pires da Silva Castro\nTU Eindhoven\n\n\nTim van Erven\nLeiden University\n\n\nBotond Szabo\nLeiden University\n\n\n\nTutorial Speakers\n\n\n\nPeter Bartlett\nUniversity of California - Berkeley\n\n\nJohannes Schmidt-Hieber\nUniversity of Twente\n\n\nNathan Srebro\nToyota Technological Institute at Chicago and University of Chicago\n\n\n\nInvited Speakers\n\n\n\nMax Welling\nUniversity of Amsterdam\n\n\nTaco Cohen\nUniversity of Amsterdam\n\n\nJulien Mairal\nINRIA - Grenoble\n\n\nSander Bohté\nCWI\n\n\n\nProgramme\nThe workshop schedule is available here: YES2019_schedule.pdf \nAbstracts\nPeter Bartlett \nPRESENTATION: Deep Networks I Deep Networks II \nGeneralization in deep networks I\, II \nWe study how the performance of prediction rules on training data compares to their predictive accuracy for classification and regression problems. We examine how this depends on notions of complexity of the prediction rules\, such as Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension and Rademacher averages\, and how these quantities can be bounded for neural networks. Deep networks raise some novel challenges\, since they have been observed to perform well even with a perfect fit to the training data.\nIn an effort to understand the performance of interpolating prediction rules\, we present some preliminary results for the simple case of linear regression\, and highlight the questions raised for deep learning. \nPRESENTATION: Optimization in Deep Residual Networks III \nOptimization in Deep Residual Networks III\nWe consider properties of deep residual networks that are relevant to optimization. For networks that compute near-identity maps at each layer\, we find that their representational power improves with depth\, and that the functional optimization landscape has the desirable property that stationary points are optimal. We consider implications for optimization in deep linear networks\, showing how the success of a family of gradient descent algorithms that regularize towards the identity function depends on a positivity condition of the regression function. \nJohannes Schmidt-Hieber \nStatistical theory for shallow networks and advantages of additional layers \nPRESENTATION: Statistical Theory 1 and 2 \nLecture 1) We start with the universal approximation theorem and discuss several proof strategies that provide some insights into functions that can be easily approximated by shallow networks. Based on this\, a survey on approximation rates for shallow networks is given. It is shown how this leads to estimation rates. In the lecture\, we also discuss methods that fit shallow networks to data. Why are deep networks better than shallow networks? We provide a survey of the existing ideas in the literature. In particular\, we study localisation properties of deep networks and discuss the Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem.\nLecture 2) Statistical theory for deep ReLU networks We outline the theory underlying the recent bounds on the estimation risk of deep ReLU networks. In the lecture\, we discuss specific properties of the ReLU activation function that relate to skip connections and efficient approximation of polynomials. Based on this\, we show how risk bounds can be obtained for sparsely connected networks. \nPRESENTATION: Statistical Theory 3 \nLecture 3) Comparison to other statistical methods and open problems\nThere is some literature comparing deep vs. shallow networks. The statistical approach allows us also to provide a theoretical comparison of the performance of deep networks to other well-established methods such as wavelet methods and MARS (multivariate adaptive regression splines). The second part of the third lecture is devoted to outline future challenges in the field. We describe important steps needed for the future development of the statistical theory. \n \nNati Srebro \nPRESENTATION: Inductive Bias\, Generalization and the role of Optimization in Deep Learning \nLearning with Underdetermined Non-Convex Models (aka Deep Learning)\nIn this three-part tutorial we will begin by reviewing the foundational principles of machine learning\, and then see how they apply to learning multi-layer models\, aka “deep learning”. We will then try to understand the appeal\, and also the mysteries\, of deep learning. In particular\, we will highlight the crucial role of implicit or explicit regularization in parameter space\, and what this induces in function space. \nInvited Speakers \nMax Welling \nFrom Graphical Models to Deep Learning: a Synthesis\nGraphical models have been the workhorse of machine learning for over a decade. Until deep learning took over as the new paradigm. But graphical models (GM) and deep learning (DL) should be considered complementary technologies. Graphical models are a great tool to express prior knowledge\, including causal relationships. They provide a much more explainable and statistically well founded paradigm for building models and reasoning about random variables. Deep learning on the other hand provides a powerful tool for "black box" prediction on raw inputs. A natural question is how to fruitfully combine these paradigms. In this talk I will discuss the various efforts we have pursued in AMLAB to achieve this GM-DL synthesis. We discuss variational auto-encoders\, recurrent inference machines and graphical\nrecurrent inference networks as examples of an emerging unified framework. \nJulien Mairal \nGroup Invariance and Stability to Deformations of Deep Convolutional\nRepresentations\nIn this work\, we study invariant properties of convolutional neural networks\, their stability to image deformations\, and their model complexity from a kernel point of view. This is achieved by designing a multilayer kernel representations for deep neural networks and by studying the geometry of the corresponding reproducing kernel Hilbert space. We show that the signal representation is stable and that models from this functional space\, such as a large class of convolutional neural networks with homogeneous activation functions\, may enjoy the same stability. In particular\, we study the norm of such models\, which acts as a measure of complexity that controls both stability and generalization. This is a joint work with Alberto Bietti.\nTaco Cohen - Gauge Fields in Deep Learning Gauge field theory is the foundation of modern physics\, including general relativity and the standard model of physics. It describes how a theory of physics should transform under symmetry transformations. For instance\, in electrodynamics\, electric forces may transform into magnetic forces if we transform a static observer to one that moves at constant speed. Similarly\, in general relativity acceleration and gravity are equated to each other under symmetry transformations. Gauge fields also play a crucial role in modern quantum field\ntheory and the standard model of physics\, where they describe the forces between particles that transform into each other under (abstract) symmetry transformations.\nIn this work we describe how the mathematics of gauge groups becomes inevitable when you are interested in deep learning on manifolds. Defining a convolution on a manifold involves transporting geometric objects such as feature vectors and kernels across the manifold\, which due to curvature become path dependent. As such it becomes impossible to represent these objects in a global reference frame and one is forced to consider local frames. These reference frames are arbitrary and changing between them is called a (local) gauge transformation. Since we do not want our computations to depend on the specific choice of frames we are forced to consider equivariance of our convolutions under gauge transformations. These considerations result in the first fully general theory of deep learning on manifolds\, with gauge equivariant convolutions as the necessary key ingredient. \nSander Bohté \nThe biology of deep learning\nAs some may recall\, deep learning and neural networks are bio-inspired\, in the sense that some of their functioning is inspired by beliefs about how the neurons in the brain conspire to transform perception into action. What do we at present know about deep learning in the brain? What can we learn from it? Is it relevant? These are some of the topics I will touch upon\, discussing networks of spiking neurons\, models of biologically plausible deep learning\, and the relation to the emerging field of neuromorphics. \nContributed Speakers \nMariia Vladimirova \nUnderstanding priors in Bayesian neural networks at the Unit level\nWe investigate deep Bayesian neural networks with Gaussian priors on the weights and ReLU-like nonlinearities\, shedding light on novel sparsity-inducing mechanisms at the level of the units of the network\, both pre- and post-nonlinearities. The main thrust of the work is to establish that the units prior distribution becomes increasingly heavy-tailed with depth. We show that first layer units are Gaussian\, second layer units are sub-Exponential\, and we introduce sub-Weibull distributions to characterize the deeper layers units. Bayesian neural networks with Gaussian priors are well known to induce the weight decay penalty on the weights. In contrast\, our result indicates a more elaborate regularization scheme at the level of the units. This result provides new theoretical insight on deep Bayesian neural networks\, underpinning their natural shrinkage properties and practical potential. \nAnastasia Botovykh \nUnderstanding generalisation in noisy time series forecasting\nIn this presentation we study the loss surface of neural networks for noisy time series\nforecasting. We aim to gain insight into the effects of deep versus wide networks on the loss surface and the structure of the critical points. In extrapolation problems for noisy time series\, neural networks\, due to their overparametrization\, tend to overfit and the behavior of the model on the training data does not measure accurately the behaviour on unseen data due to e.g. changing underlying factors in the time series. Avoiding overfitting and finding a pattern in the data that persists for a longer period of time can thus be very challenging. In this talk we quantify what the neural network has learned using the structure of the loss surface of multi-layer neural networks. We study the role that the optimization method plays in the generalisation capabilities and gain insight into which minima are able to generalise well based on the spectrum of the Hessian matrix and the smoothness of the learned function with respect to the input. Based on the structure of the time series we quantify how to make the trade-off between the complexity of the learned function and the ability of the function to fit the data well so that the network can generalise well. \nBenjamin Bloem-Reddy \nProbabilistic symmetry and invariant neural networks\nIn an effort to improve the performance of deep neural networks in data-scarce\, non-i.i.d.\, or unsupervised settings\, much recent research has been devoted to encoding invariance under symmetry transformations into neural network architectures. We treat the neural network input and output as random variables\, and consider group invariance from the perspective of probabilistic symmetry. Drawing on tools from probability and statistics\, we establish a link between functional and probabilistic symmetry\, and obtain functional representations of probability distributions that are invariant or equivariant under the action of a compact group. Those representations characterize the structure of neural networks that can be used to represent such distributions and yield a general program for constructing invariant stochastic or deterministic neural networks. We develop the details of the general program for exchangeable sequences and arrays\, recovering a number of recent examples as special cases.\n(joint work with Yee Whye Teh. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06082) \nWouter Koolen \nActive Learning in the age of Deep Learning\nDeep neural networks are successfully applied in passive learning settings\, where a labelled data set is readily available. In this talk we look at active learning problems\, where the learning system controls data acquisition\, as well as reinforcement learning\, where the actions of the learning algorithm influence the state of the world. We fist introduce the problem setting\, and argue that active learning holds the promise of greatly reducing sample complexity. We then zoom into one successful example\, AlphaZero\, review its architecture and training procedure\, and highlight the roles of exploration\, planning and curve fitting. We complement the picture with recent results in pure exploration for stochastic bandits\, where asymptotically optimal algorithms are starting to become available for a variety of problems\, and look at the lessons for future integrated systems. \nLukas Szpruch \nDeep Learning through the lens of Mean-Filed Control Problem\nIn this work\, we will demonstrate that one can view training of deep neural network as sampling from a probability distribution over the parameter space. In the case of one hidden layer\, it has been observed in the literature that the original finite-dimensional non-convex optimisation problem becomes convex at the cost of working on infinite dimensional space of probability measures. Nonetheless using techniques from the theory of Optimal Transport and gradient flow on the Wasserstein space in particular\, one can provide theoretical guarantees for global converges for the general optimisation algorithm. Gradient flow evolution equation\, also known as McKean-Vlasov eqautions\, can be then projected on finite dimensional space using a system of interacting particles in the spirit of propagation of chaos. This top-down approach is very fruitful as it allows to recover stochastic gradient algorithms used in practice but also paves the way to new algorithms for training neural nets. I shed some light on how the above methodology can be used to train multilayer networks. \n \nRegistration\nWe are at full capacity for this workshop. The registration is therefore closed! \nPractical Information\nLink to information page \nSponsors and Financial Support\n \n \n
URL:https://www.eurandom.tue.nl/event/yes-x-deep-learning-foundations/
LOCATION:Eurandom\, Metaforum\, Eindhoven\, Netherlands
CATEGORIES:YES
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR